Difference between revisions of "Talk:Introduction"

From Girlfriend Kari Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
There wasn't really anything wrong at all, if you'd prefer it how it was then its fine. The main reason I changed it was the type ratio of the previous example which had 6 SWEET girls and only 3 COOL & 3 POP girls. Also the art of the Matsuri card kinda looked out of place/slightly lower quality compared to all the other cards. [[User:AkuAkane|AkuAkane]] ([[User talk:AkuAkane|talk]]) 23:18, 24 March 2015 (EDT)
 
There wasn't really anything wrong at all, if you'd prefer it how it was then its fine. The main reason I changed it was the type ratio of the previous example which had 6 SWEET girls and only 3 COOL & 3 POP girls. Also the art of the Matsuri card kinda looked out of place/slightly lower quality compared to all the other cards. [[User:AkuAkane|AkuAkane]] ([[User talk:AkuAkane|talk]]) 23:18, 24 March 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
Oh, looks like my subconscious bias for "sweet" girls managed to show when I made that picture...I didn't even notice that. The new picture works just as fine, so there's definitely no reason to change it back. [[User:Erina|Erina]] ([[User talk:Erina|talk]]) 23:21, 24 March 2015 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 03:21, 25 March 2015

Something kinda random, but was there anything wrong with the original "sample girl cards" images that was in this article? I'm kinda curious as to why you replaced that image. Erina (talk) 22:59, 24 March 2015 (EDT)

There wasn't really anything wrong at all, if you'd prefer it how it was then its fine. The main reason I changed it was the type ratio of the previous example which had 6 SWEET girls and only 3 COOL & 3 POP girls. Also the art of the Matsuri card kinda looked out of place/slightly lower quality compared to all the other cards. AkuAkane (talk) 23:18, 24 March 2015 (EDT)

Oh, looks like my subconscious bias for "sweet" girls managed to show when I made that picture...I didn't even notice that. The new picture works just as fine, so there's definitely no reason to change it back. Erina (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2015 (EDT)